The Gospel of Jesus according to the Urantia book. 2. Travels - From Papers 130-134

  The Gospel of Jesus 1-2- Youth-Travels - Urantia foundation.epub

***

Read online

The Gospel of Jesus according to the Urantia book. 

2. Travels - From Papers 130-134

***

Евангелие от Иисуса согласно Книге Урантии. 1. 

Детство-Юность- 

Из статей 120-134

Автоматический Google-перевод с английского на русский

https://www.urantia.org/

The Gospel of Jesus

 according to The Urantia Book

2. Travels - From Papers 130-134

130:0.1 (1427.1) THE tour of the Roman world consumed most of the twenty-eighth and the entire twenty-ninth year of Jesus’ life on earth. Jesus and the two natives from India—Gonod and his son Ganid—left Jerusalem on a Sunday morning, April 26, a.d. 22. They made their journey according to schedule, and Jesus said good-bye to the father and son in the city of Charax on the Persian Gulf on the tenth day of December the following year, a.d. 23.

130:1.1 (1428.1) During their stay in Joppa, Jesus met Gadiah, a Philistine interpreter who worked for one Simon a tanner. Gonod’s agents in Mesopotamia had transacted much business with this Simon; so Gonod and his son desired to pay him a visit on their way to Caesarea. While they tarried at Joppa, Jesus and Gadiah became warm friends. This young Philistine was a truth seeker. Jesus was a truth giver; he was the truth for that generation on Urantia. When a great truth seeker and a great truth giver meet, the result is a great and liberating enlightenment born of the experience of new truth.

130:1.2 (1428.2) One day after the evening meal Jesus and the young Philistine strolled down by the sea, and Gadiah, not knowing that this “scribe of Damascus” was so well versed in the Hebrew traditions, pointed out to Jesus the ship landing from which it was reputed that Jonah had embarked on his ill-fated voyage to Tarshish. And when he had concluded his remarks, he asked Jesus this question: “But do you suppose the big fish really did swallow Jonah?” Jesus perceived that this young man’s life had been tremendously influenced by this tradition, and that its contemplation had impressed upon him the folly of trying to run away from duty; Jesus therefore said nothing that would suddenly destroy the foundations of Gadiah’s present motivation for practical living. In answering this question, Jesus said: “My friend, we are all Jonahs with lives to live in accordance with the will of God, and at all times when we seek to escape the present duty of living by running away to far-off enticements, we thereby put ourselves in the immediate control of those influences which are not directed by the powers of truth and the forces of righteousness. The flight from duty is the sacrifice of truth. The escape from the service of light and life can only result in those distressing conflicts with the difficult whales of selfishness which lead eventually to darkness and death unless such God-forsaking Jonahs shall turn their hearts, even when in the very depths of despair, to seek after God and his goodness. And when such disheartened souls sincerely seek for God—hunger for truth and thirst for righteousness—there is nothing that can hold them in further captivity. No matter into what great depths they may have fallen, when they seek the light with a whole heart, the spirit of the Lord God of heaven will deliver them from their captivity; the evil circumstances of life will spew them out upon the dry land of fresh opportunities for renewed service and wiser living.”

130:1.3 (1428.3) Gadiah was mightily moved by Jesus’ teaching, and they talked long into the night by the seaside, and before they went to their lodgings, they prayed together and for each other. This was the same Gadiah who listened to the later preaching of Peter, became a profound believer in Jesus of Nazareth, and held a memorable argument with Peter one evening at the home of Dorcas. And Gadiah had very much to do with the final decision of Simon, the wealthy leather merchant, to embrace Christianity.

130:1.5 (1429.1) Jesus’ last visit with Gadiah had to do with a discussion of good and evil. This young Philistine was much troubled by a feeling of injustice because of the presence of evil in the world alongside the good. He said: “How can God, if he is infinitely good, permit us to suffer the sorrows of evil; after all, who creates evil?” It was still believed by many in those days that God creates both good and evil, but Jesus never taught such error. In answering this question, Jesus said: “My brother, God is love; therefore he must be good, and his goodness is so great and real that it cannot contain the small and unreal things of evil. God is so positively good that there is absolutely no place in him for negative evil. Evil is the immature choosing and the unthinking misstep of those who are resistant to goodness, rejectful of beauty, and disloyal to truth. Evil is only the misadaptation of immaturity or the disruptive and distorting influence of ignorance. Evil is the inevitable darkness which follows upon the heels of the unwise rejection of light. Evil is that which is dark and untrue, and which, when consciously embraced and willfully endorsed, becomes sin.

130:1.6 (1429.2) “Your Father in heaven, by endowing you with the power to choose between truth and error, created the potential negative of the positive way of light and life; but such errors of evil are really nonexistent until such a time as an intelligent creature wills their existence by mischoosing the way of life. And then are such evils later exalted into sin by the knowing and deliberate choice of such a willful and rebellious creature. This is why our Father in heaven permits the good and the evil to go along together until the end of life, just as nature allows the wheat and the tares to grow side by side until the harvest.” Gadiah was fully satisfied with Jesus’ answer to his question after their subsequent discussion had made clear to his mind the real meaning of these momentous statements.

130:2.4 (1430.2) One of the young men who worked with Jesus one day on the steering paddle became much interested in the words which he dropped from hour to hour as they toiled in the shipyard. When Jesus intimated that the Father in heaven was interested in the welfare of his children on earth, this young Greek, Anaxand, said: “If the Gods are interested in me, then why do they not remove the cruel and unjust foreman of this workshop?” He was startled when Jesus replied, “Since you know the ways of kindness and value justice, perhaps the Gods have brought this erring man near that you may lead him into this better way. Maybe you are the salt which is to make this brother more agreeable to all other men; that is, if you have not lost your savor. As it is, this man is your master in that his evil ways unfavorably influence you. Why not assert your mastery of evil by virtue of the power of goodness and thus become the master of all relations between the two of you? I predict that the good in you could overcome the evil in him if you gave it a fair and living chance. There is no adventure in the course of mortal existence more enthralling than to enjoy the exhilaration of becoming the material life partner with spiritual energy and divine truth in one of their triumphant struggles with error and evil. It is a marvelous and transforming experience to become the living channel of spiritual light to the mortal who sits in spiritual darkness. If you are more blessed with truth than is this man, his need should challenge you. Surely you are not the coward who could stand by on the seashore and watch a fellow man who could not swim perish! How much more of value is this man’s soul floundering in darkness compared to his body drowning in water!”

130:2.5 (1430.3) Anaxand was mightily moved by Jesus’ words. Presently he told his superior what Jesus had said, and that night they both sought Jesus’ advice as to the welfare of their souls. And later on, after the Christian message had been proclaimed in Caesarea, both of these men, one a Greek and the other a Roman, believed Philip’s preaching and became prominent members of the church which he founded. Later this young Greek was appointed the steward of a Roman centurion, Cornelius, who became a believer through Peter’s ministry. Anaxand continued to minister light to those who sat in darkness until the days of Paul’s imprisonment at Caesarea, when he perished, by accident, in the great slaughter of twenty thousand Jews while he ministered to the suffering and dying.

130:2.6 (1431.1) Ganid was, by this time, beginning to learn how his tutor spent his leisure in this unusual personal ministry to his fellow men, and the young Indian set about to find out the motive for these incessant activities. He asked, “Why do you occupy yourself so continuously with these visits with strangers?” And Jesus answered: “Ganid, no man is a stranger to one who knows God. In the experience of finding the Father in heaven you discover that all men are your brothers, and does it seem strange that one should enjoy the exhilaration of meeting a newly discovered brother? To become acquainted with one’s brothers and sisters, to know their problems and to learn to love them, is the supreme experience of living.”

130:2.7 (1431.2) This was a conference which lasted well into the night, in the course of which the young man requested Jesus to tell him the difference between the will of God and that human mind act of choosing which is also called will. In substance Jesus said: The will of God is the way of God, partnership with the choice of God in the face of any potential alternative. To do the will of God, therefore, is the progressive experience of becoming more and more like God, and God is the source and destiny of all that is good and beautiful and true. The will of man is the way of man, the sum and substance of that which the mortal chooses to be and do. Will is the deliberate choice of a self-conscious being which leads to decision-conduct based on intelligent reflection.

130:2.8 (1431.3) That afternoon Jesus and Ganid had both enjoyed playing with a very intelligent shepherd dog, and Ganid wanted to know whether the dog had a soul, whether it had a will, and in response to his questions Jesus said: “The dog has a mind which can know material man, his master, but cannot know God, who is spirit; therefore the dog does not possess a spiritual nature and cannot enjoy a spiritual experience. The dog may have a will derived from nature and augmented by training, but such a power of mind is not a spiritual force, neither is it comparable to the human will, inasmuch as it is not reflective—it is not the result of discriminating higher and moral meanings or choosing spiritual and eternal values. It is the possession of such powers of spiritual discrimination and truth choosing that makes mortal man a moral being, a creature endowed with the attributes of spiritual responsibility and the potential of eternal survival.” Jesus went on to explain that it is the absence of such mental powers in the animal which makes it forever impossible for the animal world to develop language in time or to experience anything equivalent to personality survival in eternity. As a result of this day’s instruction Ganid never again entertained belief in the transmigration of the souls of men into the bodies of animals.

130:2.9 (1431.4) The next day Ganid talked all this over with his father, and it was in answer to Gonod’s question that Jesus explained that “human wills which are fully occupied with passing only upon temporal decisions having to do with the material problems of animal existence are doomed to perish in time. Those who make wholehearted moral decisions and unqualified spiritual choices are thus progressively identified with the indwelling and divine spirit, and thereby are they increasingly transformed into the values of eternal survival—unending progression of divine service.”

130:2.10 (1431.5) It was on this same day that we first heard that momentous truth which, stated in modern terms, would signify: “Will is that manifestation of the human mind which enables the subjective consciousness to express itself objectively and to experience the phenomenon of aspiring to be Godlike.” And it is in this same sense that every reflective and spiritually minded human being can become creative.

Read more online 

The Gospel of Jesus according to the Urantia book. 2. Travels - From Papers 130-134

The Gospel of Jesus according to the Urantia book. 1-Childhood-Youth - From Papers 120-129

 The Gospel of Jesus 1-2- Youth-Travels - Urantia foundation.epub

***

 1. Childhood-Youth- From Papers 120-129 

- Read online

***

Евангелие от Иисуса согласно Книге Урантии. 1. 

Детство-Юность- 

Из статей 120-134

Автоматический Google-перевод с английского на русский

https://www.urantia.org/

The Gospel of Jesus

 according to The Urantia Book

1. Childhood-Youth- From Papers 120-129

123:3.4 (1359.5) Before Jesus was six years of age, in the early summer of 1 b.c., Zacharias and Elizabeth and their son John came to visit the Nazareth family. Jesus and John had a happy time during this, their first visit within their memories. Although the visitors could remain only a few days, the parents talked over many things, including the future plans for their sons. While they were thus engaged, the lads played with blocks in the sand on top of the house and in many other ways enjoyed themselves in true boyish fashion.

123:3.6 (1360.1) During this year Joseph and Mary had trouble with Jesus about his prayers. He insisted on talking to his heavenly Father much as he would talk to Joseph, his earthly father. This departure from the more solemn and reverent modes of communication with Deity was a bit disconcerting to his parents, especially to his mother, but there was no persuading him to change; he would say his prayers just as he had been taught, after which he insisted on having “just a little talk with my Father in heaven.”

123:5.11 (1363.4) When entering school at seven years (at this time the Jews had just inaugurated a compulsory education law), it was customary for the pupils to choose their “birthday text,” a sort of golden rule to guide them throughout their studies, one upon which they often expatiated at their graduation when thirteen years old. The text which Jesus chose was from the Prophet Isaiah: “The spirit of the Lord God is upon me, for the Lord has anointed me; he has sent me to bring good news to the meek, to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and to set the spiritual prisoners free.”

123:6.8 (1365.3) In February, Nahor, one of the teachers in a Jerusalem academy of the rabbis, came to Nazareth to observe Jesus, having been on a similar mission to Zacharias’s home near Jerusalem. He came to Nazareth at the instigation of John’s father. While at first he was somewhat shocked by Jesus’ frankness and unconventional manner of relating himself to things religious, he attributed it to the remoteness of Galilee from the centers of Hebrew learning and culture and advised Joseph and Mary to allow him to take Jesus back with him to Jerusalem, where he could have the advantages of education and training at the center of Jewish culture. Mary was half persuaded to consent; she was convinced her eldest son was to become the Messiah, the Jewish deliverer; Joseph hesitated; he was equally persuaded that Jesus was to grow up to become a man of destiny, but what that destiny would prove to be he was profoundly uncertain. But he never really doubted that his son was to fulfill some great mission on earth. The more he thought about Nahor’s advice, the more he questioned the wisdom of the proposed sojourn in Jerusalem.

123:6.9 (1365.4) Because of this difference of opinion between Joseph and Mary, Nahor requested permission to lay the whole matter before Jesus. Jesus listened attentively, talked with Joseph, Mary, and a neighbor, Jacob the stone mason, whose son was his favorite playmate, and then, two days later, reported that since there was such a difference of opinion among his parents and advisers, and since he did not feel competent to assume the responsibility for such a decision, not feeling strongly one way or the other, in view of the whole situation, he had finally decided to “talk with my Father who is in heaven”; and while he was not perfectly sure about the answer, he rather felt he should remain at home “with my father and mother,” adding, “they who love me so much should be able to do more for me and guide me more safely than strangers who can only view my body and observe my mind but can hardly truly know me.” They all marveled, and Nahor went his way, back to Jerusalem. And it was many years before the subject of Jesus’ going away from home again came up for consideration.

124:3.8 (1371.1) The only time Jesus ever saw his father angry with him was that night in their room at the inn when, in the course of their discussions, the boy so far forgot the trends of Jewish thought as to suggest that they go back home and work for the building of an amphitheater at Nazareth. When Joseph heard his first-born son express such un-Jewish sentiments, he forgot his usual calm demeanor and, seizing Jesus by the shoulder, angrily exclaimed, “My son, never again let me hear you give utterance to such an evil thought as long as you live.” Jesus was startled by his father’s display of emotion; he had never before been made to feel the personal sting of his father’s indignation and was astonished and shocked beyond expression. He only replied, “Very well, my father, it shall be so.” And never again did the boy even in the slightest manner allude to the games and other athletic activities of the Greeks as long as his father lived.

125:0.1 (1377.1) NO INCIDENT in all Jesus’ eventful earth career was more engaging, more humanly thrilling, than this, his first remembered visit to Jerusalem. He was especially stimulated by the experience of attending the temple discussions by himself, and it long stood out in his memory as the great event of his later childhood and early youth. This was his first opportunity to enjoy a few days of independent living, the exhilaration of going and coming without restraint and restrictions. This brief period of undirected living, during the week following the Passover, was the first complete freedom from responsibility he had ever enjoyed. And it was many years subsequent to this before he again had a like period of freedom from all sense of responsibility, even for a short time.

125:0.6 (1378.1) Though many of the temple rituals very touchingly impressed his sense of the beautiful and the symbolic, he was always disappointed by the explanation of the real meanings of these ceremonies which his parents would offer in answer to his many searching inquiries. Jesus simply would not accept explanations of worship and religious devotion which involved belief in the wrath of God or the anger of the Almighty. In further discussion of these questions, after the conclusion of the temple visit, when his father became mildly insistent that he acknowledge acceptance of the orthodox Jewish beliefs, Jesus turned suddenly upon his parents and, looking appealingly into the eyes of his father, said: “My father, it cannot be true—the Father in heaven cannot so regard his erring children on earth. The heavenly Father cannot love his children less than you love me. And I well know, no matter what unwise thing I might do, you would never pour out wrath upon me nor vent anger against me. If you, my earthly father, possess such human reflections of the Divine, how much more must the heavenly Father be filled with goodness and overflowing with mercy. I refuse to believe that my Father in heaven loves me less than my father on earth.”

125:0.7 (1378.2) When Joseph and Mary heard these words of their first-born son, they held their peace. And never again did they seek to change his mind about the love of God and the mercifulness of the Father in heaven.

125:5.1 (1382.3) Jesus’ third day with the scribes and teachers in the temple witnessed the gathering of many spectators who, having heard of this youth from Galilee, came to enjoy the experience of seeing a lad confuse the wise men of the law. Simon also came down from Bethany to see what the boy was up to. Throughout this day Joseph and Mary continued their anxious search for Jesus, even going several times into the temple but never thinking to scrutinize the several discussion groups, although they once came almost within hearing distance of his fascinating voice.

125:5.2 (1382.4) Before the day had ended, the entire attention of the chief discussion group of the temple had become focused upon the questions being asked by Jesus. Among his many questions were:

125:5.3 (1382.5) 1. What really exists in the holy of holies, behind the veil?

125:5.4 (1382.6) 2. Why should mothers in Israel be segregated from the male temple worshipers?

125:5.5 (1382.7) 3. If God is a father who loves his children, why all this slaughter of animals to gain divine favor—has the teaching of Moses been misunderstood?

125:5.6 (1382.8) 4. Since the temple is dedicated to the worship of the Father in heaven, is it consistent to permit the presence of those who engage in secular barter and trade?

125:5.7 (1382.9) 5. Is the expected Messiah to become a temporal prince to sit on the throne of David, or is he to function as the light of life in the establishment of a spiritual kingdom?

125:6.1 (1383.4) Jesus was strangely unmindful of his earthly parents; even at breakfast, when Lazarus’s mother remarked that his parents must be about home by that time, Jesus did not seem to comprehend that they would be somewhat worried about his having lingered behind.

125:6.2 (1383.5) Again he journeyed to the temple, but he did not pause to meditate at the brow of Olivet. In the course of the morning’s discussions much time was devoted to the law and the prophets, and the teachers were astonished that Jesus was so familiar with the Scriptures, in Hebrew as well as Greek. But they were amazed not so much by his knowledge of truth as by his youth.

125:6.3 (1383.6) At the afternoon conference they had hardly begun to answer his question relating to the purpose of prayer when the leader invited the lad to come forward and, sitting beside him, bade him state his own views regarding prayer and worship.

125:6.4 (1383.7) The evening before, Jesus’ parents had heard about this strange youth who so deftly sparred with the expounders of the law, but it had not occurred to them that this lad was their son. They had about decided to journey out to the home of Zacharias as they thought Jesus might have gone thither to see Elizabeth and John. Thinking Zacharias might perhaps be at the temple, they stopped there on their way to the City of Judah. As they strolled through the courts of the temple, imagine their surprise and amazement when they recognized the voice of the missing lad and beheld him seated among the temple teachers.

125:6.5 (1384.1) Joseph was speechless, but Mary gave vent to her long-pent-up fear and anxiety when, rushing up to the lad, now standing to greet his astonished parents, she said: “My child, why have you treated us like this? It is now more than three days that your father and I have searched for you sorrowing. Whatever possessed you to desert us?” It was a tense moment. All eyes were turned on Jesus to hear what he would say. His father looked reprovingly at him but said nothing.

125:6.6 (1384.2) It should be remembered that Jesus was supposed to be a young man. He had finished the regular schooling of a child, had been recognized as a son of the law, and had received consecration as a citizen of Israel. And yet his mother more than mildly upbraided him before all the people assembled, right in the midst of the most serious and sublime effort of his young life, thus bringing to an inglorious termination one of the greatest opportunities ever to be granted him to function as a teacher of truth, a preacher of righteousness, a revealer of the loving character of his Father in heaven.

125:6.7 (1384.3) But the lad was equal to the occasion. When you take into fair consideration all the factors which combined to make up this situation, you will be better prepared to fathom the wisdom of the boy’s reply to his mother’s unintended rebuke. After a moment’s thought, Jesus answered his mother, saying: “Why is it that you have so long sought me? Would you not expect to find me in my Father’s house since the time has come when I should be about my Father’s business?”

125:6.8 (1384.4) Everyone was astonished at the lad’s manner of speaking. Silently they all withdrew and left him standing alone with his parents. Presently the young man relieved the embarrassment of all three when he quietly said: “Come, my parents, none has done aught but that which he thought best. Our Father in heaven has ordained these things; let us depart for home.”

125:6.9 (1384.5) In silence they started out, arriving at Jericho for the night. Only once did they pause, and that on the brow of Olivet, when the lad raised his staff aloft and, quivering from head to foot under the surging of intense emotion, said: “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, and the people thereof, what slaves you are—subservient to the Roman yoke and victims of your own traditions—but I will return to cleanse yonder temple and deliver my people from this bondage!”

125:6.10 (1384.6) On the three days’ journey to Nazareth Jesus said little; neither did his parents say much in his presence. They were truly at a loss to understand the conduct of their first-born son, but they did treasure in their hearts his sayings, even though they could not fully comprehend their meanings.

125:6.11 (1384.7) Upon reaching home, Jesus made a brief statement to his parents, assuring them of his affection and implying that they need not fear he would again give any occasion for their suffering anxiety because of his conduct. He concluded this momentous statement by saying: “While I must do the will of my Father in heaven, I will also be obedient to my father on earth. I will await my hour.”

Read more online

1. Childhood-Youth- From Papers 120-129 - Read online

You Are the Salt of the Earth - Fatherly and Brotherly Love

 140:4.1 (1572.1) The so-called “Sermon on the Mount” is not the gospel of Jesus. It does contain much helpful instruction, but it was Jesus’ ordination charge to the twelve apostles. It was the Master’s personal commission to those who were to go on preaching the gospel and aspiring to represent him in the world of men even as he was so eloquently and perfectly representative of his Father.

0:4.1 (1572.1) Так называемая «Нагорная проповедь» не является евангелием Иисуса. Она действительно содержит много полезных наставлений, однако это был наказ, данный Иисусом при рукоположении двенадцати апостолов, личное поручение Учителя тем, кому предстояло отправиться с проповедью евангелия в стремлении представлять его в мире людей так же, как он столь красноречиво и совершенно представлял своего Отца.

140:4.2 (1572.2) “You are the salt of the earth, salt with a saving savor. But if this salt has lost its savor, wherewith shall it be salted? It is henceforth good for nothing but to be cast out and trodden under foot of men.”

140:4.2 (1572.2) «Вы – соль земли, соль со спасительной силой. Но если соль становится безвкусной, то как она снова станет соленой? Непригодна она более ни к чему, разве только выбросить ее, чтобы затоптали ее ногами».

140:4.3 (1572.3) In Jesus’ time salt was precious. It was even used for money. The modern word “salary” is derived from salt. Salt not only flavors food, but it is also a preservative. It makes other things more tasty, and thus it serves by being spent.

140:4.3 (1572.3) Во времена Иисуса соль была ценным продуктом. Ею даже пользовались вместо денег. Современное слово salary (зарплата) происходит от слова salt (соль). Соль не только приправляет пищу, но является также консервантом. Она придает вкус другим продуктам; так она служит свою службу тем, что ее расходуют.

140:4.4 (1572.4) “You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it gives light to all who are in the house. Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and be led to glorify your Father who is in heaven.”

140:4.4 (1572.4) «Вы – свет мира. Нельзя скрыть город, построенный на вершине холма. И никто не прячет зажженный светильник под перевернутый кверху дном сосуд, а ставят его на подсвечник; и он светит всем в доме. Пусть свет ваш сияет перед людьми так, чтобы они видели ваши добрые деяния и пришли к прославлению вашего небесного Отца».

40:4.5 (1572.5) While light dispels darkness, it can also be so “blinding” as to confuse and frustrate. We are admonished to let our light so shine that our fellows will be guided into new and godly paths of enhanced living. Our light should so shine as not to attract attention to self. Even one’s vocation can be utilized as an effective “reflector” for the dissemination of this light of life.

140:4.5 (1572.5) Хотя свет рассеивает тьму, он может быть также настолько «слепящим», что приводит в смущение и повергает в уныние. Нас призывают светить так, чтобы направлять своих товарищей на новые и благочестивые стези лучшей жизни. Наш свет должен сиять так, чтобы не привлекать внимания к нам самим. Даже собственная профессия может использоваться в качестве эффективного «отражателя», распространяющего этот свет жизни.

140:4.6 (1572.6) Strong characters are not derived from not doing wrong but rather from actually doing right. Unselfishness is the badge of human greatness. The highest levels of self-realization are attained by worship and service. The happy and effective person is motivated, not by fear of wrongdoing, but by love of right doing.

0:4.6 (1572.6) Сильный характер возникает не оттого, что человек не творит зло, а оттого, что он реально творит добро. Бескорыстие является признаком человеческого величия. Высшие уровни самореализации достигаются в поклонении и служении. Счастливый и активный человек движется не тем, что боится совершить дурной поступок, а тем, что любит творить добрые дела.

140:4.7 (1572.7) “By their fruits you shall know them.” Personality is basically changeless; that which changes—grows—is the moral character. The major error of modern religions is negativism. The tree which bears no fruit is “hewn down and cast into the fire.” Moral worth cannot be derived from mere repression—obeying the injunction “Thou shalt not.” Fear and shame are unworthy motivations for religious living. Religion is valid only when it reveals the fatherhood of God and enhances the brotherhood of men.

40:4.7 (1572.7) «По плодам их узнáете их». Личность в основном остается неизменной; изменяется – растет – нравственный характер. Основным заблуждением современных религий является негативизм. Дерево, не приносящее плодов, «срубают и бросают в огонь». Нравственные ценности не могут быть следствием одного только подавления – подчинения требованию «не смей». Страх и стыд – мотивация, недостойная религиозной жизни. Религия убедительна лишь тогда, когда она раскрывает отцовство Бога и укрепляет братство людей.

140:4.8 (1572.8) An effective philosophy of living is formed by a combination of cosmic insight and the total of one’s emotional reactions to the social and economic environment. Remember: While inherited urges cannot be fundamentally modified, emotional responses to such urges can be changed; therefore the moral nature can be modified, character can be improved. In the strong character emotional responses are integrated and co-ordinated, and thus is produced a unified personality. Deficient unification weakens the moral nature and engenders unhappiness.

140:4.8 (1572.8) Действенная философия жизни складывается из постижения космоса и всей совокупности эмоциональных реакций человека на его социальное и экономическое окружение. Помните: хотя унаследованные побуждения невозможно изменить коренным образом, эмоциональные реакции на такие побуждения подвержены изменениям. Поэтому нравственная природа способна видоизменяться, характер способен улучшаться. В сильном характере эмоциональные реакции взаимосвязаны и согласованы; так формируется цельная личность. Недостаточная цельность ослабляет нравственную природу и порождает несчастье.

140:4.9 (1572.9) Without a worthy goal, life becomes aimless and unprofitable, and much unhappiness results. Jesus’ discourse at the ordination of the twelve constitutes a master philosophy of life. Jesus exhorted his followers to exercise experiential faith. He admonished them not to depend on mere intellectual assent, credulity, and established authority.

140:4.9 (1572.9) Без достойной цели жизнь становится бессмысленной и бесполезной. В этом кроется причина многих бед. Речь Иисуса при рукоположении двенадцати апостолов представляет собой образцовую философию жизни. Иисус призвал своих последователей развивать в себе эмпирическую веру. Он предупреждал их, что одного только интеллектуального согласия недостаточно, что не следует быть излишне доверчивыми и полагаться на признанные авторитеты.

140:4.10 (1573.1) Education should be a technique of learning (discovering) the better methods of gratifying our natural and inherited urges, and happiness is the resulting total of these enhanced techniques of emotional satisfactions. Happiness is little dependent on environment, though pleasing surroundings may greatly contribute thereto.

140:4.10 (1573.1) Образование должно быть методом постижения (открытия) более совершенных методов удовлетворения наших естественных и унаследованных побуждений, и счастье является проистекающей отсюда совокупностью этих улучшенных методов достижения эмоционального удовлетворения. Счастье мало зависит от среды, хотя приятное окружение может значительно способствовать счастью.

140:4.11 (1573.2) Every mortal really craves to be a complete person, to be perfect even as the Father in heaven is perfect, and such attainment is possible because in the last analysis the “universe is truly fatherly.”

140:4.11 (1573.2) Каждый смертный действительно стремится стать полноценным существом, быть совершенным, как совершенен небесный Отец, и такое достижение возможно потому, что в конечном счете «вселенной присущ подлинно отеческий характер».

140:5.1 (1573.3) From the Sermon on the Mount to the discourse of the Last Supper, Jesus taught his followers to manifest fatherly love rather than brotherly love. Brotherly love would love your neighbor as you love yourself, and that would be adequate fulfillment of the “golden rule.” But fatherly affection would require that you should love your fellow mortals as Jesus loves you.

140:5.1 (1573.3) Начиная с Нагорной проповеди и кончая речью на Тайной Вечере, Иисус учил своих последователей проявлять отеческую любовь, а не братскую любовь. Любить своего ближнего братской любовью – значит любить его, как себя самого, что было бы адекватно выполнению «золотого правила». Отеческое же чувство предполагает, что вы любите своих смертных собратьев так же, как Иисус любит вас.

140:5.2 (1573.4) Jesus loves mankind with a dual affection. He lived on earth as a twofold personality—human and divine. As the Son of God he loves man with a fatherly love—he is man’s Creator, his universe Father. As the Son of Man, Jesus loves mortals as a brother—he was truly a man among men.

0:5.2 (1573.4) Иисус любит человечество двоякой любовью. Он жил на земле как двуединая личность – человеческая и божественная. Как Сын Божий, он любит человека отеческой любовью – он является Создателем человека, его вселенским Отцом. Как Сын Человеческий, Иисус любит смертных как брат – он поистине являлся человеком среди людей

140:5.3 (1573.5) Jesus did not expect his followers to achieve an impossible manifestation of brotherly love, but he did expect them to so strive to be like God—to be perfect even as the Father in heaven is perfect—that they could begin to look upon man as God looks upon his creatures and therefore could begin to love men as God loves them—to show forth the beginnings of a fatherly affection. In the course of these exhortations to the twelve apostles, Jesus sought to reveal this new concept of fatherly love as it is related to certain emotional attitudes concerned in making numerous environmental social adjustments.

140:5.3 (1573.5) Иисус не надеялся на то, что в проявлении братской любви его последователи достигнут невозможного, однако он действительно надеялся, что они будут стремиться стать подобными Богу, – быть совершенными, как совершенен небесный Отец, – и что они смогут начать смотреть на человека так же, как Бог смотрит на свои создания, и потому смогут начать любить людей так же, как Бог любит их, – проявлять зачатки отеческого чувства. В ходе этих наставлений Иисус попытался раскрыть двенадцати апостолам новое понятие отеческой любви в той мере, в какой оно имеет отношение к некоторым эмоциональным состояниям, связанным с осуществлением многочисленных социальных приспособлений к среде.

140:5.4 (1573.6) The Master introduced this momentous discourse by calling attention to four faith attitudes as the prelude to the subsequent portrayal of his four transcendent and supreme reactions of fatherly love in contrast to the limitations of mere brotherly love.

140:5.4 (1573.6) Учитель начал свое знаменательное рассуждение с того, что обратил внимание апостолов на четыре состояния веры, что стало вступлением к последующему изображению его четырех трансцендентных и высших реакций отеческой любви в противоположность ограничениям всего лишь братской любви.

40:5.5 (1573.7) He first talked about those who were poor in spirit, hungered after righteousness, endured meekness, and who were pure in heart. Such spirit-discerning mortals could be expected to attain such levels of divine selflessness as to be able to attempt the amazing exercise of fatherly affection; that even as mourners they would be empowered to show mercy, promote peace, and endure persecutions, and throughout all of these trying situations to love even unlovely mankind with a fatherly love. A father’s affection can attain levels of devotion that immeasurably transcend a brother’s affection.

140:5.5 (1573.7) Сначала он говорил о тех, кто нищ духом, жаждет праведности, безропотно кроток и чист сердцем. От таких смертных, распознающих дух, можно ожидать достижения тех уровней божественного бескорыстия, на которых они становятся способными к поразительному проявлению отеческого чувства; можно ожидать, что даже в скорби они найдут в себе возможность проявлять милосердие, укреплять мир и стойко переносить преследования, продолжая во всех этих трудных положениях любить отеческой любовью даже непривлекательное человечество. Отеческое чувство способно достичь уровней преданности, неизмеримо превышающих братское чувство.

140:5.6 (1573.8) The faith and the love of these beatitudes strengthen moral character and create happiness. Fear and anger weaken character and destroy happiness. This momentous sermon started out upon the note of happiness.

0:5.6 (1573.8) Вера и любовь, заключенные в этих заповедях блаженства, укрепляют нравственный характер и создают счастье. Страх и гнев ослабляют характер и разрушают счастье. Эта знаменательная проповедь началась с темы счастья.

140:5.7 (1573.9) 1. “Happy are the poor in spirit—the humble.” To a child, happiness is the satisfaction of immediate pleasure craving. The adult is willing to sow seeds of self-denial in order to reap subsequent harvests of augmented happiness. In Jesus’ times and since, happiness has all too often been associated with the idea of the possession of wealth. In the story of the Pharisee and the publican praying in the temple, the one felt rich in spirit—egotistical; the other felt “poor in spirit”—humble. One was self-sufficient; the other was teachable and truth-seeking. The poor in spirit seek for goals of spiritual wealth—for God. And such seekers after truth do not have to wait for rewards in a distant future; they are rewarded now. They find the kingdom of heaven within their own hearts, and they experience such happiness now.

140:5.7 (1573.9) 1. «Счастливы нищие духом – смиренные». Для ребенка счастье – это незамедлительное удовлетворение жажды удовольствий. Взрослый человек готов посеять семена самоотречения, чтобы впоследствии собрать урожай возросшего счастья. Во времена Иисуса и в последующие эпохи счастье слишком часто отождествлялось с идеей обладания богатством. В рассказе о фарисее и мытаре, молившихся в храме, один чувствовал себя богатым духом – самовлюбленным; другой чувствовал себя «нищим духом» – смиренным. Один был самодовольным, другой был способен к учению и искал истину. Нищие духом ищут цели, содержащие духовное богатство, – ищут Бога. И таким искателям истины не нужно ждать награды в далеком будущем; они получают ее сейчас. Они находят царство небесное в своих собственных сердцах, и они ощущают это счастье сейчас.

140:5.8 (1574.1) 2. “Happy are they who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be filled.” Only those who feel poor in spirit will ever hunger for righteousness. Only the humble seek for divine strength and crave spiritual power. But it is most dangerous to knowingly engage in spiritual fasting in order to improve one’s appetite for spiritual endowments. Physical fasting becomes dangerous after four or five days; one is apt to lose all desire for food. Prolonged fasting, either physical or spiritual, tends to destroy hunger.

140:5.8 (1574.1) 2. «Счастливы изголодавшиеся и жаждущие праведности, ибо они насытятся». Только те, кто чувствует себя нищими духом, смогут когда-либо возжаждать праведности. Только кроткие ищут божественную силу и стремятся обрести духовную мощь. Однако было бы чрезвычайно опасно сознательно идти на духовный пост для того, чтобы усилить стремление к духовным дарам. Через четыре или пять дней физический пост становится опасным; человек может полностью утратить вкус к пище. Продолжительный пост – будь он физическим или духовным – способен уничтожить чувство голода.

140:5.9 (1574.2) Experiential righteousness is a pleasure, not a duty. Jesus’ righteousness is a dynamic love—fatherly-brotherly affection. It is not the negative or thou-shalt-not type of righteousness. How could one ever hunger for something negative—something “not to do”?

140:5.9 (1574.2) Эмпирическая праведность – это наслаждение, а не обязанность. Праведность Иисуса – его динамичная любовь, отечески-братское чувство. Такой тип праведности не является негативным, или запретительным. Как вообще можно жаждать чего-то негативного – жаждать «не делать»?

140:5.10 (1574.3) It is not so easy to teach a child mind these first two of the beatitudes, but the mature mind should grasp their significance.

140:5.10 (1574.3) Не так легко объяснить детскому разуму две эти первые заповеди блаженства, однако зрелый разум должен быть способным понять их смысл.

140:5.11 (1574.4) 3. “Happy are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.” Genuine meekness has no relation to fear. It is rather an attitude of man co-operating with God—“Your will be done.” It embraces patience and forbearance and is motivated by an unshakable faith in a lawful and friendly universe. It masters all temptations to rebel against the divine leading. Jesus was the ideal meek man of Urantia, and he inherited a vast universe.

140:5.11 (1574.4) 3. «Счастливы кроткие, ибо они унаследуют землю». Подлинная кротость не имеет ничего общего со страхом. Наоборот: она является отношением человека, сотрудничающего с Богом, – «да будет воля твоя». Она включает терпение и выдержку и побуждается несгибаемой верой в законопослушную и дружественную вселенную. Она укрощает любой соблазн восстать против божественного руководства. Иисус был идеалом кроткого урантийца, и он унаследовал обширную вселенную.

140:5.12 (1574.5) 4. “Happy are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.” Spiritual purity is not a negative quality, except that it does lack suspicion and revenge. In discussing purity, Jesus did not intend to deal exclusively with human sex attitudes. He referred more to that faith which man should have in his fellow man; that faith which a parent has in his child, and which enables him to love his fellows even as a father would love them. A father’s love need not pamper, and it does not condone evil, but it is always anticynical. Fatherly love has singleness of purpose, and it always looks for the best in man; that is the attitude of a true parent.

140:5.12 (1574.5) 4. «Счастливы чистые сердцем, ибо они узрят Бога». Духовная чистота не является отрицательной категорией, если не считать того, что в ней действительно отсутствуют подозрительность и мстительность. Говоря о чистоте, Иисус не имел в виду только человеческие отношения между полами. В первую очередь он подразумевал необходимую человеку веру в своего ближнего – ту веру в своего дитя, которая есть у родителя и которая позволяет ему любить своих собратьев так же, как их любил бы отец. Любви отца чуждо баловство; она не потворствует злу и всегда нетерпима к цинизму. Отеческая любовь отличается целеустремленностью и всегда ищет в человеке лучшее; таково отношение настоящего родителя.

140:5.13 (1574.6) To see God—by faith—means to acquire true spiritual insight. And spiritual insight enhances Adjuster guidance, and these in the end augment God-consciousness. And when you know the Father, you are confirmed in the assurance of divine sonship, and you can increasingly love each of your brothers in the flesh, not only as a brother—with brotherly love—but also as a father—with fatherly affection.

140:5.13 (1574.6) Видеть Бога с помощью веры – значит обрести истинную духовную проницательность. Духовная проницательность, в свою очередь, помогает руководству Настройщика и вместе с ним ведет к усилению богосознания. А когда вы знаете Отца, вы обретаете прочную уверенность в божественном сыновстве и начинаете всё больше любить каждого из своих братьев во плоти не только как брат – братской любовью, – но и как отец – отеческим чувством.

140:5.14 (1574.7) It is easy to teach this admonition even to a child. Children are naturally trustful, and parents should see to it that they do not lose that simple faith. In dealing with children, avoid all deception and refrain from suggesting suspicion. Wisely help them to choose their heroes and select their lifework.

140:5.14 (1574.7) Этот совет легко усваивается даже ребенком. Дети от природы доверчивы, и родители должны следить за тем, чтобы они не утратили этой простой веры. Общаясь с детьми, избегайте обмана и старайтесь не давать повода для подозрений. Мудро помогайте им выбирать своих героев и определять дело жизни.

140:5.15 (1574.8) And then Jesus went on to instruct his followers in the realization of the chief purpose of all human struggling—perfection—even divine attainment. Always he admonished them: “Be you perfect, even as your Father in heaven is perfect.” He did not exhort the twelve to love their neighbors as they loved themselves. That would have been a worthy achievement; it would have indicated the achievement of brotherly love. He rather admonished his apostles to love men as he had loved them—to love with a fatherly as well as a brotherly affection. And he illustrated this by pointing out four supreme reactions of fatherly love:

140:5.15 (1574.8) После этого Иисус стал учить своих последователей реализации главной цели человеческих устремлений – совершенства – и даже достижения божественности. Он всегда наставлял их: «Будьте совершенны, как совершенен Отец ваш небесный». Он не призывал апостолов любить своих ближних, как самих себя. Это было бы достойным свершением и означало бы достижение братской любви. Скорее, Иисус призывал своих апостолов любить людей так, как любил их он, – любить отеческой, равно как и братской любовью. И в качестве иллюстрации он указал на четыре высших свойства отеческой любви.

140:5.16 (1575.1) 1. “Happy are they who mourn, for they shall be comforted.” So-called common sense or the best of logic would never suggest that happiness could be derived from mourning. But Jesus did not refer to outward or ostentatious mourning. He alluded to an emotional attitude of tenderheartedness. It is a great error to teach boys and young men that it is unmanly to show tenderness or otherwise to give evidence of emotional feeling or physical suffering. Sympathy is a worthy attribute of the male as well as the female. It is not necessary to be calloused in order to be manly. This is the wrong way to create courageous men. The world’s great men have not been afraid to mourn. Moses, the mourner, was a greater man than either Samson or Goliath. Moses was a superb leader, but he was also a man of meekness. Being sensitive and responsive to human need creates genuine and lasting happiness, while such kindly attitudes safeguard the soul from the destructive influences of anger, hate, and suspicion.

140:5.16 (1575.1) 1. «Счастливы скорбящие, ибо они будут утешены». Исходя из так называемого здравого смысла или безупречной логики, счастье никогда не может быть следствием скорби. Однако Иисус не имел в виду внешнюю или нарочитую скорбь. Он говорил об эмоциональном отношении мягкосердечности. Великая ошибка – внушать мальчикам и юношам, что проявление ласки и вообще эмоционального чувства или физического страдания недостойно мужчины. Сочувствие красит и мужчину, и женщину. Чтобы стать мужественным, совсем не обязательно быть бессердечным. Это порочный путь воспитания отважных мужчин. Величайшие люди этого мира не боялись скорби. Скорбный Моисей был более великим человеком, чем Самсон или Голиаф. Моисей являлся выдающимся вождем, оставаясь кротким человеком. Чувствительность и отзывчивость к человеческой беде создает подлинное и устойчивое счастье, и в то же время эти добрые отношения защищают душу от губительных воздействий гнева, ненависти и подозрительности.

140:5.17 (1575.2) 2. “Happy are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy.” Mercy here denotes the height and depth and breadth of the truest friendship—loving-kindness. Mercy sometimes may be passive, but here it is active and dynamic—supreme fatherliness. A loving parent experiences little difficulty in forgiving his child, even many times. And in an unspoiled child the urge to relieve suffering is natural. Children are normally kind and sympathetic when old enough to appreciate actual conditions.

140:5.17 (1575.2) 2. «Счастливы милостивые, ибо им будет оказана милость». Здесь милость означает высоту, широту и глубину истинной дружбы – милосердие. Милость бывает пассивной, но в данном случае она является активной и динамичной – высшим проявлением отеческого чувства. Любящему родителю легко простить своего ребенка, даже много раз. И в неиспорченном ребенке живет естественное стремление облегчить страдание. Дети обычно добры и отзывчивы, когда они становятся достаточно взрослыми для того, чтобы быть способными по достоинству оценить реальные обстоятельства.

140:5.18 (1575.3) 3. “Happy are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the sons of God.” Jesus’ hearers were longing for military deliverance, not for peacemakers. But Jesus’ peace is not of the pacific and negative kind. In the face of trials and persecutions he said, “My peace I leave with you.” “Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.” This is the peace that prevents ruinous conflicts. Personal peace integrates personality. Social peace prevents fear, greed, and anger. Political peace prevents race antagonisms, national suspicions, and war. Peacemaking is the cure of distrust and suspicion.

140:5.18 (1575.3) 3. «Счастливы миротворцы, ибо они будут названы сынами Божьими». Слушатели Иисуса жаждали призыва к войне, а не к миру. Однако мир Иисуса – не пацифистского и негативного свойства. В преддверии судов и преследований он говорил: «Свой мир я оставляю вам». «Да не смутятся сердца ваши и да не устрашатся». Такой мир предотвращает разрушительные конфликты. Внутренний мир объединяет личность. Социальный мир предотвращает страх, алчность и гнев. Политический мир предотвращает расовые антагонизмы, национальную подозрительность и войны. Миротворчество избавляет от недоверия и подозрительности.

140:5.19 (1575.4) Children can easily be taught to function as peacemakers. They enjoy team activities; they like to play together. Said the Master at another time: “Whosoever will save his life shall lose it, but whosoever will lose his life shall find it.”

140:5.19 (1575.4) Детей легко научить быть миротворцами. Им нравится действовать сообща; они любят играть вместе. В другом случае Учитель сказал: «Тот, кто сохранит свою жизнь, тот потеряет ее, а кто потеряет свою жизнь, тот обретет ее».

140:5.20 (1575.5) 4. “Happy are they who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Happy are you when men shall revile you and persecute you and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely. Rejoice and be exceedingly glad, for great is your reward in heaven.”

140:5.20 (1575.5) 4. «Счастливы преследуемые за праведность, ибо царство небесное принадлежит им. Счастливы вы, когда оскорбляют вас и преследуют и всячески клевещут на вас. Радуйтесь и ликуйте, ибо велика ваша награда на небесах».

40:5.21 (1575.6) So often persecution does follow peace. But young people and brave adults never shun difficulty or danger. “Greater love has no man than to lay down his life for his friends.” And a fatherly love can freely do all these things—things which brotherly love can hardly encompass. And progress has always been the final harvest of persecution.

140:5.21 (1575.6) Сколь часто вслед за миром наступают преследования. Однако молодые люди и храбрые взрослые никогда не страшатся трудностей или опасностей. «Нет больше той любви, как если кто отдаст жизнь свою за друзей». Отеческой любви легко дается всё это – то, что едва ли доступно любви братской. И окончательным результатом преследований всегда является прогресс.

140:5.22 (1575.7) Children always respond to the challenge of courage. Youth is ever willing to “take a dare.” And every child should early learn to sacrifice.

140:5.22 (1575.7) Дети неизменно откликаются, когда требуется проявить мужество. Юность никогда не отказывается «рискнуть». И каждый ребенок должен с раннего детства учиться жертвовать.

140:5.23 (1575.8) And so it is revealed that the beatitudes of the Sermon on the Mount are based on faith and love and not on law—ethics and duty.

140:5.23 (1575.8) Отсюда видно, что заповеди блаженства Нагорной проповеди основаны на вере и любви, а не на законе – этике и долге.

140:5.24 (1575.9) Fatherly love delights in returning good for evil—doing good in retaliation for injustice.

140:5.24 (1575.9) Отеческая любовь радуется, когда платит добром за зло – творит добро в ответ на несправедливость.